| |
|
|
Zdzislaw Beksinski - About the artist
By Tomasz Gryglewicz
Many Faces of Beksinski's Art - Analysis
The work of Zdzislaw Beksinski may be sub-divided into two periods
different in character and duration: his Avant Garde period, which
lasted merely a few years, and his second period, in which the artist
has been developing his own image, characteristic of his art and
recognisable to his recipients. An architect by education, after three
years of practice Beksinski quit the profession to devote himself to
the visual arts. His decision to enter on a career in the arts
coincided with the political thaw of October 1956, which in the arts
in Poland - after the previous spell of Social Realism and isolation -
brought an enthusiastic reception of the Avant Garde from all over the
world. Beksinski joined in the contemporary art trend, and soon earned
success and made a reputation for himself, especially in experimental
photography and sculpture, in which - alongside his plaster casts - he
used untypical materials, such as metal and wire, to build structures
delicately balanced on the border between pure abstraction and
allusion, frequently distant, to the shape of the human body. This was
quite a common phenomenon in that period, within the framework of
informal abstraction, and also within modern abstract sculpture.
The 1960's just as for many of the recent protagonists of hot
abstraction, brought a radical switch in the work of Beksinski towards
an art trend described in the Polish terminology as metaphorical
painting. In the global art the term usually applied to this kind of
art is Fantastic Realism, since albeit the scenes presented in it are
painted realistically, yet the reality is totally unreal, as if from a
world of dreams or hallucinations. Beksinski started to create first
drawings and later paintings which were overtly figural and visionary
in nature with a strong element of Expressionism: a characteristic of
his mature work.
In his drawings made after 1960 there is a palpable fascination by
the human figure in scenes full of violence and sex, which was
characteristic of the entire movement called the nowa figuracja active
in that decade. But his way of presenting the human body started to
depart more and more from its real appearance, and Beksinski became
more and more fascinated by ugliness: skin that was decomposing and
separating from its underlayers, an exaggerated presentation of the
network of veins and nerves, bone structure.
In his chronologically later period as a painter alongside the
human being, or rather its spectre or corpse, there now appeared new
motifs which, putting it briefly, expressed the concept of vanitas,
the vanity of the material world, which is doomed to death and
decomposition. Each of Beksinski's pictures seems to be saying,
'memento mori: remember thou shalt die,' and the message is especially
forceful in his representations of the most widespread religious
symbol in our civilisation: the crucified figure. In Beksinski's
pictures the Crucified Man, too, has succumbed to the destructive
force of time, since all that remains of his body is a trunk without a
head or lower limbs, hanging from deformed arms.
This invoking of the idea of vanitas situates Beksinski within an
extremely broad tradition, deriving not only directly from Surrealism,
which gave birth to Fantastic Realism; but it also linking him with
the Late Middle Ages, the times of the work of Grünewald and
Hieronymus Bosch; with the Mannerism of the Brueghels; with Baroque;
and above all with Romanticism and Symbolism, with the works of Arnold
Böcklin and Alfred Kubin. Beksinski paints vast expanses of
wilderness or boundless stretches of billowing sea, dramatically
convoluted vortices of clouds over the horizon; mysterious
burial-grounds and ruins; Gothic cathedrals structured as if of bone
or built of dry, twisted boughs; shipwrecks; skulls, skeletons,
wolves, nocturnal scenes; the glow of moonlight etc. But he penetrates
even more profoundly into the world of unreal reality than was
possible in the art of the nineteenth century. His visions become more
individual, typical only of his own personal visions, of his own
individual style.
His scenes, which might even seem quite likely, are marked by a
spectral deformation. Beksinski is capable of endowing an ordinary
setting with a grotesque atmosphere, achieving a demonic effect of
alienation.
Beksinski's visionary painting took on its full shape in the 1970's
This does not mean stagnation. His creativity has been evolving all
the time and undergoing transformation in the subsequent decades. The
1990's brought another significant transformation within his permanent
paradigm of style and content. He sublimated his expressive means more
and more. He reduced his motifs and signs, concentrating on the
figures and faces, mutated and made unreal. As always, he was
interested in the structure of the body surface, treated almost always
autonomously, however, separately from the inner construction. His
third dimension, perspective depth, was reduced to a plane, a smooth
background in silvery greys. A specific kind of decorativeness
appeared.
Every artist has some sort of image, some sort of vision that
fascinates and terrifies him. Such an image lurks deeply hidden at the
bottom of the layers of his sub-conscious, closely guarded from the
light of day, since it is too personal, too sensitive. This applies
especially to those artists who, using the world of their inner
imagination, paint fantasy. Their rudimentary, traumatic visions are
materialised in their works in forms artistically processed and
adapted to such an extent that their original meaning is neither clear
nor legible to recipients. Sometimes however the artist reveals just
slightly more of the mystery surrounding his visions; sometimes this
happens in those of his works which are not typical in terms of form,
in which the elements of aesthetic transformation have been reduced to
a minimum, while the pictorial content has been presented more
unambiguously and explicitly. Thus they may constitute a specific kind
of key to understanding a given artist's work, providing the symbols
and motifs in them recur in other works by him in an artistically more
sublimated shape.
In two of Beksinski's 1968 heliotypes there are some naked figures:
a man hanging from a post and a beautiful woman who is torturing him,
her face covered by a scarf or a wisp of hair. There exists a direct
narrative relation between the two figures. In the first picture the
woman is pushing a sharp object into the man's side; in the second one
his dead body hangs motionless, and the woman holds the sharp object
she has just taken out. These two small works are distinct from the
background of Beksinski's graphics and drawings by their realism, and
especially through the magical effect of the three-dimensionality in
the idealised treatment of the very sensuous, youthful female nude, as
contrasted with the cumbersome man.
The figure of a beautiful woman often symbolises death. An example
of this is offered by Jacek Malczewski's Thanatos series. On the other
hand the archetypal association of death with eroticism, and the
elements of masochism and misogyny suggest links with the Polish
graphics artists and masters of drawing of the interwar period,
especially Bruno Schulz. These works relate not only to a strictly
erotic content. The figure of the hanging man will return in his
numerous presentations of the Crucified, which perform the function of
a metaphor for the artist's fate - a typical feature of Expressionism
in the wide sense of the term.
We should recollect here that Beksinski does not like the content
of his work being too concretely analysed. Although the presentational
layer tends to be extremely developed in his works, he never fits them
out with literary titles, as if ostentatiously, as his forebears, the
Surrealists, did. That is why the symbolism and significance of his
works may be even more elusive. Rather the recipient is immersed in a
specific, sombre atmosphere, instead of deciphering particular visual
signs and symbols. In this sense Beksinski's art is asemantic, in
compliance with the artist's declarations. However, at the bottom
there are the archetypes, profoundly hidden in his sub-conscious,
which express man's most primitive impulses: fear of death,
decomposition, and ugliness, and fascination by physical beauty and
eroticism.
Tomasz Gryglewicz
Professor Tomasz Gryglewicz is an art historian. He has been a
fellow of the Jagiellonian University Institute for the History of Art
since 1973, and the Institute's Director in 1996-1999. Since 1995 he
has been Head of the Department of Modern Art , a distinguished
connoisseur of contemporary art, author of the books Groteska w sztuce
polskiej XXw. (The Grotesque in Polish Twentieth-Century Art), Kraków,
1984; and Malarstwo Europy Srodkowej 1900-1914 (Central European
Painting, 1900-1914), as well as of numerous publications on late
19th- and 20th-century painting. He is also an art critic, and a
member of AICA.
|
|
 |
|